Saturday, December 13, 2008

Elvis And Me Free Online Movies

Right to protection! POLICY AGENDA


A reflection that I am thinking of the cry that is rising in these moments:

A new global threat: protectionism.

I do not think protectionism is the evil to be avoided, the other evil! Over the past 200 years we have built the development, welfare and empowerment, but also the rights. Just for us. With wars and revolutions, right and wrong, with blood and sweat with words and attacks behind him ... But in the end we got a world chock full of rights. Enough to make us cry is the best possible world. But just for us. The rest of the world ... them to do their own!

In my opinion, therein lies our weakness. The rights! At a time when we allowed greedy cunning to produce their wealth elsewhere and the same price as if it had been produced by us, that's where our economy has gone down ... lower and lower. Elsewhere, there are no human rights. They have fought for them. They signed the Charter of '48 but, shall not talk about it ... first you need to implant the culture of the law in those countries (no weapons, I recommend). And 'here that this so-called evil of protectionism must take hold. Faced with a company that wants to produce abroad, leaving behind their former workers, the protection must:

1. Legislate in a way that the company should pay to the pension funds of the full amount of the difference between the pay of un'cinese / Bengali / Honduras / Albanian and one of his last European workers sent home. This is for the entire period of the duration of the works abroad. If you fall, cancels the obligation of that payment. A portion of the fund should be paid to the unemployment compensation and social safety nets and various other, if needed, to industries that layoffs leave the company out of business, going away.

2. Requiring the application of human rights and labor into his business abroad, like in "European home". With strict controls on the part of all organizations and individuals to produce proof of reliability or infringement, without the need for any form of permit or legal mandate to exercise control. Penalty notice from the European markets of products of those companies and the withdrawal of passports for the entire management team, from ownership of the chain last directive of European nationalities.

3. Require by law the abolition and destruction and the regime of monopoly or duopoly, wherever it existed. And if you came to know that this law is broken by secret agreements to create a cartel strategy (like the phone or oil or banking), we confiscated the entire property belonging to the owners and persons knowingly involved by the state (sanction for law making and the jail in his underwear, not like today in the world). Mass at auction, excluding any person with a bond with the old owners, must necessarily respond heavily in criminal proceedings.

This in my opinion, is protect yourself. Freedom of choice and respect for all. Around the World. Once the worker without rights, it has rights in their work, once the worker sees our national decrease the risk of losing their future, everyone becomes more free to make their own choices in life. Then we can speak calmly to understand where goes the world (perhaps in another post). We can also say that now we have everything and everything in our lives, even more superfluous than the object we have it. Now, research, industry needs to give us something new. Non-financial products. The soldier must absolutely return to a medium of exchange, investment, temporary support until they reach the return of the proceeds from the markets and nothing more. There. - Outlawing creativity aimed at buying financial debt. The debt must be restored as a temporary status under observation and ready to be rescheduled, not an instrument of domination and pressure on the world.


Saturday, December 6, 2008

How To Play To Build A Home Sheet Music

TG5


BOYS hard time coming up ...

I'd like to share an opinion with everyone on one thing, a series of things that I observed on TV Friday night.


CHANNEL 5. Point network Mediaset.

Matrix: Invited single, solitary (at least since I changed the channel on) R. Villari. The famous Rai controller. After The Matrix, the TG.

MATRIX:

Among other things, Villari said ... I still feel the PD, it is still my party and I hope you reconsider and I resume ... But soon after, makes an analysis of typical "observer" outside outlined how a force or anomaly

- "Why should we constrain the alliance with IDV" (Recall that Berlusca has placed him as a condition for dialogue with the opposition) - "Where is it written that we must maintain the alliance with IDV?".

These are the questions that arises Villari exile (pointing out that it was not only "bought" but he himself has put on sale to the highest bidder, which is basically only one). The thing so far I absolutely had made an impression. If I had not followed the TG5 later.

TG5

- "Case of the conflict of proxies of Salerno and Catanzaro. 2 separate services into one. (From here all right, except that the services sounded almost like his points opposing views). Then you see Alfano (the one that has been the provider of the popular Lodo):

- It 's obvious that we need to reform the justice in Italy.

Shit! - I said instantly. Start a tam-tam crazy as it is against justice, but as in the past have combined several havoc, took me a while 'evil. But it was just that moment of thought because it was not over. It was not even finished the service.

Who can see next? All right! Maximo whisker, the Red Max D'Alema. That in a conference unknown (the picture did not show anything) trudged to find a word to finish the sentence that can be summed up in Berlusconi's philosophy more and banality.

- It 's clear that there is a problem of justice ... (Long pause + catch phrases and incomplete while doing the doodles). We need to make reforms in the Italian courts, which must be shared ... etc., etc..

In just over 10 minutes I had the distinct feeling of knowing the securities the next day. It 'also the political agenda. It seemed so well articulated and engineered line of thought and future political action, so clear, so ably built at a table ... to feed us all.

recap everything

1. Why alliance with the IDV? (De-legitimization and questioned a the opposition, the hard and pure, uncompromising). And of those, a little 'a bit of consistency' for lack of clear political platform or a shared vision remains steadfast union election with the IDV. E 'on justice IDV no discounts.

2. Open an outrage on justice (amplifying the conflict between the attorney) to bring into disrepute the whole system, leaving out of the debate the whys and the contents of the ongoing conflict.

3. A call twice: the Red Max and the public for "an alliance in the name of the common good to reform the Italian justice" and at this point, as dictated by the mustache, even a reform of the constitution, as among other things he wanted to do with the old bicameral. At the same time outside

Di Pietro (Obsessive one who sees the content as well as "forcaiolo") and Walterloo that he keeps up with the alliance. Outvoted in politics within their own side that before the public). If you do not adjust at the minimum Walter remain off the table games. The old divide and rule.

In 2007, early summer saw another body of TG5 Sunday lunchtime. He spoke of the emergency crime and immigration. So: out of the blue. Overnight, she had become an emergency. I told people I was close: "mo break the balls with this story to get a bit 'of advertising and give control to the government. "And Veltroni was not going to reach out to the Cav. seems like a lifetime. But I am convinced that looking at the TG5 can understand very well the trends of Italian politics.

By making a calendar and the sheep who follow him.

I said mine. HAVE YOUR SAY. OR AGAINST Or something in between, as you please. BUT HAVE YOUR SAY.

... PS: Even today he said Justice that there is a problem, but any reform must be shared. Goduria What to say: I told you so


Friday, November 21, 2008

How Many Mins In Summer Gain

BUT WHERE IS THE LEFT?


Ferrero Occasionally you see on TV. And I think if it was not for Berlusconi, Veltroni would have been right. Would belong to this right.
I did not understand why the Democratic Party Is a Party "reformist". What should reform?
- It's simple - I say a second later. - Their being. They have been common.
- Who? Veltroni? Communist? But when ever? But then: Do not you remember in Albania, in the midst of the so-called communism - that makes so much horror and fear Berlusca and its lackeys - who rose to power? Who would sit in those long tables called Presidium, in front of audiences workers. Those with communism they were trying to achieve and pouring out into the country, had nothing in common apart from the card. Those that had replaced the word paro paro "Companion" with "Lord ".... and gentlemen. That's who they remind me of the young D'Alema and Veltroni in old vintage photos of rallies and meetings of the PCI. When they spoke at home, quietly, between us young (15-20 years), those faces in the presidium were called careerists, who had climbed the rigid hierarchies of the system to the sound of spying and backstabbing to the sounds of groups and other small groups that did not end as the power to decide for others. The Taste of Power. Of course, also associated with money. So: Right. Is where the reform! Being able to tell us what time they are right!
- Oh, yeah. But there will be people left over from somewhere, maybe on the left who wants to make good policy?
- seee ...! View of the former Rainbow Left, and a thousand caciucco fruit salad with fish.
is, in fact: They fish in the reality show candidate.
What then are not reality at all, that is fake and so are more drivers who can not. Years ago I shared a house with two girls, one of which was a film programmer in a well-known "reality." And he told me so many of those things - easy to define immoral and took the piss out of paying spectators - from that moment, I have not watched a single one. Not even a promo or even a discussion of them on TV. I am convinced that if they simply did not exist, the life of the Italians and not only would have been much better.
But the candidates left in the fishing reality show. Beautiful and already voted. Because of the limited votes and consensus, if for once if they are beautiful and built, there's nothing wrong with that.
But so immoral. There is so much immorality in this kind of identification with the winner of the reality. Which is itself a character discutibilissimo, but if it were live up to their statements made at the end of the telecast, the collapse of the left becomes truly defined itself Communist. He said: I do not white (for now, to tell the truth).
The Left has lost its identity. Once it was representative of the most vulnerable in society. Today the victims in the post-modern and anti-Communist rhetoric of the end of communist by consensus: the proletariat. Not realizing that the proletariat not only exists but is thicker and more discriminating than ever. And 'even weaker than before as it is located in a democracy emptied of its contents. The proletariat is not only of workers, pure class. No. That base, that the proletariat who think they have lost, which is believed to no longer exists, we are. That at any time you are not to be ... future. Just like the classic proletariat of Marx. The army of temporary workers, the army of the 50s who is faced with rebuilding their lives, because they fired in the name of mobility, bands of the unemployed of the factories have closed in search of new markets for farm laborers, slaves, without rights of people ... in the Far East, the disinherited of the legal system which are seen tight labor rights ... and not only the social stratum of the debt of the houses and the tenants who are borderline ready to do anything to raise the minimum to maintain a roof for their families. These people, is just as the proletariat of the nineteenth and twentieth century without a shred of vision of the future. Just like the blackened faces of the industrial revolution. Where the segment is given in exchange for professional claims. A little 'as the story told by the Parmigiano Reggiano Report: 9 but the costs are charged to sell 7 the product in supermarkets owl, what attracts buyers for other products. And 'even those producers are the new proletariat. Because of this passage will be forced to close because their excellent product and underpaid and are forced to derive its support from another party. Meanwhile, the left
look reality in people's representatives. And the Democratic Party in parliament to win candy and makes a grace of fate, the only survivor of the Thyssen, as if this were a political quality.