start again with a post about a movie. But this time I will speak exclusively of the film I think not. Bello, Valerio Mastandrea with a fantastic ... unprecedented way.
Zanasi the rest is very good at telling. I would say that the only real note I can do is: the film has an ending. I shall focus only on this aspect, the rest goes without saying, that works.
The substance
say that I do not know if this is a bad thing not final, maybe just really what we already serves as such. But ... maybe I expected something that would shake up the characters. But no: they are the same as the beginning of the film. No change is perhaps never change. The father said his son Stephen: "But you are you doing here? ... Everyone has to follow his way, what it does, always." This sentence is the final film but also the progenitor of the question: Why Zanasi told us about this movie if ... nothing really changes in the lives of the characters? Just to show the split of the province average Italian? These characters are as they were always programmed to perform a role that has previously run for its parent. They move helpless in reality. The only aspect that is said and not depth, that the social utility of the individual, if treated conflictualized and narrated, perhaps - no, I'm sure - maybe he would give a drop of blood to the film. It 'so much left apart from this social utility - which contains, in my opinion the reasons for which a director makes this kind of film - is just that, self-reported by the character, namely, its contribution to making life better for the other going to talk to the farmers for not using pesticides. "Do you think that stupid ,..." adds with his hair.
0 comments:
Post a Comment