How Often Do You Need To Dump Rv

ENERGIES OF THIS ... DYING

This morning, on RaiUno to UNOMATTINA we talked about energy. I followed the transmission until about 10:15. Then, the daily bread made its appeal imperative and urgent, and so I turned off the TV. Anyway: back to space devoted to this energy this morning, as guests were a study in Eni, a former Environment League converted to a lady pro-nuclear and LNG terminals.

There has been talk of nuclear power safe (Mah ..) clean coal (I always touching soiled, still ...), of LNG terminals (more CO2 into the atmosphere), but until that hour, - minutes more minutes or less - solar, hydrogen and other forms of energy production will not discussed at all. Well, almost. That is, the question on alternative energy have been given an unqualified answer: "All the production of energy have problems. "Punto! In fact, nice place to shit ... until then, of course! Then I switched off. If anyone has followed up at the bottom of the transmission and has heard of them, namely energy clean, which we know he did it. If not ... well, you guys (not et), began the subtle pro-nuclear campaign in unified networks.

remember: the sun is not in control, if not for the maintenance of the network . The color cost is really to support the panel. Eni and other companies in the world of oil, we do not earn anything. So: I am against.

I from my terrace flat, horizontal roofs to see a stretch of 90 % similar to mine. and not only in Rome, just outside centers historians, the view is pretty much the same. If everything was covered with solar panels, how much energy would be produced, or how much oil would be saved? I can accommodate a solar panel on my terrace 50m2. But my house is small in comparison to those that view gives me the eye. Bella

this scam Networks Unified those of the World Guru ineligible. 6 TV networks.

But someone who will sound the bell of clean energy will be there?

Fake State Id Templates

UNAUTHORIZED MODIFICATIONS the CONSTITUTION

Today, April 29, 2008, the fresh Prestigiacomo elected to Parliament, said before the cameras of the RAI, between a smile and the other, hoping that this parliament will become a real constituent.
They're trying to change the constitution. They also have the numbers to do so. Walt Moreover, as it has resulted in the election campaign, it seems more likely to ally or to find common language with the Guru of the World ineligible, rather than truly represent the interests of all Italians. In PD, it has triggered a race for power. And to think that they just lost soundly. I Ridomar disbelief: Who am I? Who do they represent? Who voted for them - and they did it to win, - has ever asked if they would win or not?
Now, in the words of the beautiful Prestigiacomo, desirous of a Portfolio, will turn out that the changes will the constitution. But the law has prevented the election-fraud in parliament there were representatives of the Italian people.
Now: THAT THERE ARE IN THE PARLIAMENT ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE .
I remember very well the whole debate on the representation in the parliament ...! I had heard once that you cared about the representation of the people in parliament. There has been talk for months, however, on that party. Now the Guru of the World ineligible clear conflict of interest change the Constitution. Changes are now accepting bets on a personal basis. We also do some real lotteries on laws that will make this parliament. I want a pizza I've won.
Some believe - Di Pietro a part - that there will be opposition??
Next ... someone will have best-case scenario. What a great sadness
... Optimism sad.

Company Names Start With Alphabet A

Walter Veltroni does not work for Democracy



I won a PIZZA IN AN ELECTION BET.

predicted that PD would never reach the level of 35% in the last election. IDV that would take a lot of votes, especially from the so-called people of Beppe Grillo and the Rainbow Left, would lose soundly (but that would not come out of the Transatlantic).

proletarian Dinner: pizza wine and coffee. Max € 15.00.
I, Italian new citizens, I did not vote. I had the right, but I opted for the non-voting; think as Grillo. And I think he's right.

What made me think that the Democratic Party and the Left, they would NEVER EVER won a lot is what I saw before the election, before the term ended in Mastella to face the Italians. More precisely: that Walt and Berluska met to discuss a new electoral law. And 'there that Italian democracy is in a coma. Walt has fallen into the trap of Berluska (assuming they are not comparable to snacks). For months he had hammered the public, through its networks unfair on security issue. Finally, during the birth of the Democratic Party seemed to have dropped and you were forgotten by the public, especially after the famous Decree Security, which in one way or the other calmed the mood of the people rather excited. But Walt did not forget ... Berluska that has 3 national networks. It matters little if they are abusive. Important reforms to the ... that should be publicized and sponsored ... even over the air, free (or almost). Yes, exactly: the creeping reforms Walteriane democracy at the foot of the strong powers of which, strange but true: those who pass by the Capitol buildings, it becomes infected VASSALLO. Remember the "BUT ...".
Berluska While he was inside the parliament, Walt was not even a deputy. Nobody in this country had voted its citizens' right to representation. It had no right to talk about change in the world of electoral roof to roof with his head dell'oposizione. As an extra-parliamentary any, that is like the other 58 million Italians. Or at least, since it is an important subject that concerns us all, had to choose, to go to the Guru of ineligible voters from at least all non-disabled and wheelchair-bound. By all.

But no. It would be very nice ...!!!

And now, for the third time, is to govern this country, who over the Basic Law of a Nation, the Constitution, has put her thighs.

ERRORS OF LOSERS:

1. Legitimacy of the opponent. Of this opponent.
It 's a good thing. But the opponent is of equal attributes. Nell'anomalia created after 1994, with the famous descent into the field, after the laws bought with money and bribes policy, Berlusconi has the same attributes. There
Forza Italy without Berlusconi. AN yes. But by itself would not win. The world citizen (nice term), a couple of years now, I was understanding ... slowly, and what kind of anomaly is Berlusconi. So much so that it seemed that a line between the old and the other, had left the scene slowly, especially when someone was contested in parliament once and for all the damn law ever made about the conflict of interest and stated that a disqualified person or the like.
Veltroni gave the right to exist in the Western World such a thing. That is an obscenity for Democracy. Yes, because in previous elections the political world was trivially defined as "pro-and against Berlusconi." But at least those who opposed the election of the knight made him a strong sense of true democracy, in which a candidate for the executive branch, never, never, can own newspapers and TV networks.
in the work of Veltroni is a non-sense. When was weakening, he was presented to the office and give him back to power. Not that it was not. But it seemed that the Italians were accustomed to observe good living this anomaly of Italian politics. And while we were concentrating on the real problems of all of us, salaries ... Power ... climate ... ecosystems and ecoballe ... .
Toh! The Knight! Arm in arm with Walt, walking, cleared, its TV networks.
What is the purpose of an election contest? Winning ... I hope.
................................................. ..........................................

............................................. ..............................................

other errors in the next post of the Left.

Seating Plan Wedding Board

DO NOT THINK

start again with a post about a movie. But this time I will speak exclusively of the film I think not. Bello, Valerio Mastandrea with a fantastic ... unprecedented way.
Zanasi the rest is very good at telling. I would say that the only real note I can do is: the film has an ending. I shall focus only on this aspect, the rest goes without saying, that works.

The substance

say that I do not know if this is a bad thing not final, maybe just really what we already serves as such. But ... maybe I expected something that would shake up the characters. But no: they are the same as the beginning of the film. No change is perhaps never change. The father said his son Stephen: "But you are you doing here? ... Everyone has to follow his way, what it does, always." This sentence is the final film but also the progenitor of the question: Why Zanasi told us about this movie if ... nothing really changes in the lives of the characters? Just to show the split of the province average Italian? These characters are as they were always programmed to perform a role that has previously run for its parent. They move helpless in reality. The only aspect that is said and not depth, that the social utility of the individual, if treated conflictualized and narrated, perhaps - no, I'm sure - maybe he would give a drop of blood to the film. It 'so much left apart from this social utility - which contains, in my opinion the reasons for which a director makes this kind of film - is just that, self-reported by the character, namely, its contribution to making life better for the other going to talk to the farmers for not using pesticides. "Do you think that stupid ,..." adds with his hair.