Even the best buffalo is credible but it's a hoax. The generation described in the film is credible but does not tell the real generation of the 1000 eurini there on the streets.
Certainly the director and the writer have never lived with Euro 1000 and if this has happened will have had a "help" family bank or some charity. We think that rather than 1000 € you have to build a life, a future ... who knows maybe even a few dream. And if not enough? The mechanism triggered in recent years in Italy and the world does nothing to diminish the value of € 1000 (also free paper gold equivalent).
But back to the film. At half time, I said a little 'Pallos. I enjoyed it too, for goodness' sake, but that the pace was "dismantled" that's for sure and verifiable. I was amused by the gag and find the script - that worked well within the frames are unique because there is a good staging - rather than a rhythmic construction of sussequenzialità scenes. Then we say that (wrong pace, of course) ends up hijacking the film its title and its mission. Here the viewer gets to ask if you are watching a narrative film that deals with the "Generation Euro 1000" to find true love, or "Generation Euro 1000" to find a decent future?
A title like that points directly to the second option, whereas the film embraces the former. With a few scenes in less surely would have earned at least the beat.
The actresses are very good most of the actors. The main character at times seems too ridiculous but it recovers a lot because the acting is based on the previous gag. Probably watching the main character, you could analyze the script and remove some of the scenes. Not sure what it is, but I wonder if the film would have benefited or not. Surely those who are not boring actresses. Moreover, it is love in the conflict, the conflict that lurks in the film. More exposed to quite late. Until then, the story had not given anything for a line (for example: the fight to increase eurini 1000) and structurally scenes were, as I have said little about, "dismantled". This entry to the (active) stage of the two girls. The structure of Spring without conflict has found its own axis carrier. An important axis, wrong, but effective for the room full of spectators. It would have been filled the hall with a conflict differently? Based on the particulars of his own title? I could not tell and I have not even read the book.
For the rest, though fun, does not deviate from "I Cesaroni". As we are approaching. Because I enjoyed it.
