Yesterday I saw the film Virzi "whole life ahead." At a rough guess I can say that I liked the voice of the narrator Morante was not very invasive and, from this point of view, this time joined Virzì most of the characters to tell yourself than to be told by a third party.
meantime, I was all night to reflect on the issue of precarious employment. I work as precarious, with free choice (even in the film suggests that there may be the free choice to be precarious / a. .. as a prostitute). These girls take the absolute minimum necessary to get by ... in groups and not alone. I've always lived alone. It was a choice. I took substantial pay weekly, monthly as those of the bartenders at the first experience.
There is much talk, too much in this campaign on the issue of precarious employment. As if the unemployed do not exist. Once it was fairer to be unemployed today as precarious. However ... going forward in argument.
When, long ago, drivers and electricians we hear about film shorts, documentaries or even low-budget film set, they replied in chorus or so, if you do not have the money do not make the movie. I, feeling the other side of the fence often thought that those people not interested in their special work: actively supporting the creation of a work of art: it takes money. They would have done any work to get those weekly earnings. Now times have changed and - obviously - do not think any more. Or rather, the politicians should be told to stop talking about social safety nets for the precarious: let us give to the unemployed. Must be companies to be paid weekly or monthly salary to double precarious. And if you do not have the money to do business that do not. In reality today's society is in crisis because the business has ceased to circulate the money. Is accumulating to excess. Circulation of money means both investment and wages. Ford teaches. Marx taught. The entrepreneur of Basilicata teaches.
As in the work of cinema: the work for a short time, get more. The Serial long, much less pay per week that advertising.
Imagine a world where many young people choose to invest "uncertain employment" at this point would invalidate the very word to define the status of the worker. There would be around a lot more money and desire to take risks and above all a lot more honesty in relations Business-Employees.
The policy should provide a legislative form. But they have created is no situation so I have high hopes. Trade unions (parasitic enough, as the film Virzi told) should be brave and do not get into those famous negotiations of the social partners where they always go back to 90 degrees, but to the streets to demonstrate the right to higher wages for shorter time of use. The right to have social safety nets by the company itself and not by other taxpayers ... that given the modern times, do not fare so well. These are the companies that have summarized the social role - and they're glissando in recent times. And as if the state would pay for half workers and half the companies. But the state does not enter anything in his pocket instead of the owners of the company. We live in a time that is not enough money. No. You should gain the absolute maximum. Yes, but then what? After the absolute ... What is it?
http://www2.beppegrillo.it/v2day/
